Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Devinks/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * Added. See below. --Jack Frost (talk) 04:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Added. See below. --Jack Frost (talk) 04:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I'm aware that this is WP:DUCK so no need for CU. Please just block him before he creates any more hoax articles. Thanks. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:15, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * is the master (by 6 minutes...) and is already blocked. I've run an SQL query for similar usernames and found created 2 days after Devinks10 was blocked, however their only edit thus far was to create a user sandbox. Given timeline and similarity in username; CU may be of benefit to confirm any link. --Jack Frost (talk) 04:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. . Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Username + same error messages obsession. The whole contributions and log screams of a duck. On another note talk page access may need to be revoked for previous two accounts ( for 2021-03-05). theinstantmatrix (talk) 04:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Ran a username database search given their recent form and spotted (amongst  from the archive), leading me back here. To echo,  each of these accounts  given their contributions, page creations, and very specific interests. E.g. User:Devinks30/sandbox and User talk:Devinks69. I don't know that a sleeper check is going to be that useful given their (presently) very distinctive style, but perhaps a look for an underlying range to block might not go astray. --Jack Frost (talk) 02:10, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ Devinks30. No new ones. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 00:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , closing. Blablubbs | talk 01:30, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Username and edits suggest DUCK, requesting CU to check for sleepers and block the underlying ip(s) since a number of accounts have been created recently (only listed above the ones not already blocked) --DannyS712 (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅. Bagging and tagging socks. This SPI can be closed...  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:11, 23 May 2021 (UTC)