Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dickonlandia/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Besides the same username and basically admitting it, both edited Bot requests and that's not the first page a new user would edit. Looks like a troll/vandal or a complete failure of CIR. — HELL KNOWZ ∣ TALK 09:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Thanks, yeah the reported account got blocked after I made the SPI by who I assume didn't see this SPI. — HELL KNOWZ ∣ TALK 14:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping . I didn't see this SPI however the quacking was loud enough. --   LuK3      (Talk)   14:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * These two are already blocked; FWIW, they are ✅, and I see no other accounts. Closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  13:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
A Similar pattern in the threat to block from editing. (1), (2)  HurricaneEdgar    12:14, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . . --Blablubbs (talk) 20:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Anti-blocker111 says "Hello anti blockers, welcome to Dickonlandia! " on their user page:  Mvqr  (talk) 12:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ to and blocked., but I didn't run an exhaustive check. Not sure if this one needs tags, given the userpage.  --Blablubbs (talk) 12:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Closing. Spicy (talk) 15:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)