Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Diegowakik/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( originally filed under this user)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Both accounts were created in recent days (SHE Pabllo Vittar on Sept. 7 and EmersonGuui on Sept 9) and neither have any valid contributions besides a "keep" vote on Articles for deletion/BreakTudo Awards. It seems that these accounts were created solely to create "an illusion of support" and to, deliberately, defraud the AfD. SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 23:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Related cases:


 * Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Maria Dulight.
 * Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/BreakTudo Awards 2018 (investigation showed use of sockpuppets)
 * Wikipédia:Páginas para eliminar/BreakTudo Awards 2017 (votes to "Keep" suspects)

J talk 10:39, 11 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Add Raonyphillips . J  talk 10:39, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - It's certainly possible these are both who they say they are. Both accounts were initially created on ptwiki.  One is from 2014, the other is brand new.  Neither have any appreciable editing history on any wiki.  Could be socks.  Could be canvassed.  Suspicious enough to justify CU. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * It would be better for a ptwiki CU to look at this as I've never dealt with this type of data before and don't feel comfortable making determinations based on very few edits, or trying to find sleepers. --  Amanda  (aka DQ) 09:32, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * From my check at ptwiki I'd go with ❌ based on technical data. However, this is an area with lots of meat and sockpuppeting at ptwiki, so I wouldn't discard something like this happening here. Best, — Thanks for the fish!  talk •contribs  21:18, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , Could you also look at, noted by User:JardelW above? They're already blocked on ptwiki, both of their commons uploads look like they're about to be deleted, and with their only edits here to Articles for deletion/BreakTudo Awards, it's really just a question of whether to block them for socking or for some other reason. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd again go with ❌, but more and more this looks like meatpuppeting. Their location varies a lot, but it's too much of a coincidence that their first edits are to the RfD. Best, — Thanks for the fish!  talk •contribs  18:03, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked everybody as NOTHERE, closing. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I merged this case over because of the overlap. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 23:18, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I'm filing this mostly to notify enwiki CUs about this as they are now active here too.

The ones that I've filed are the ones that aren't stale. You can find more at pt:Categoria:!Fantoches_de_Diegowakik

Most of them are stale, yes, so it's basically reporting so that action can be taken to proceed with a lock. They are also active on Commons.

Thanks! — Thanks for the fish!  talk •contribs  23:04, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Will be going off ptwiki CU for blocks. Also, ✅:
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 23:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 23:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 23:11, 28 November 2020 (UTC)