Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DinduMcMuffins/Archive

19 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Doug Weller talk 09:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ The first 2 have already been blocked due to username violations. I'll block the last one and tag all of them. Doug Weller talk 09:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Did you miss the second account? Why did you file a SPI at all, you could've run a CU at your own behest (it's just 2 socks!). -- QEDK ( T  &#9749;  C ) 19:09, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I did run the CU, hence the confirmed tag. I always file an SPI for the record, both in case of future socks and for stats if anyone needs them. I decided to leave the other sock - they might try to edit again after the IP block expires and then I can check for more sleepers. At least that seems a good idea to me, others may differ. Doug Weller  talk 16:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * It's certainly fine, but I'm new to the block, so it was utterly confusing. -- QEDK ( T  &#9749;  C ) 16:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)