Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dineshmahto111/Archive

12 April 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Sibbs11 was blocked for removing sourced content from the article Mahto, including from multiple IPs (111.119.234.75, 106.194.44.83, 111.119.234.69, 195.59.125.25, 111.119.234.61, 111.119.234.43). After Sibbs11 was blocked, the new account Kris1016 made a similar edit:


 * Sibbs11
 * Kris1016 utcursch &#124; talk 11:34, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please, compare the two based on provided diffs.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. I've blocked the sock and increased the master's block to 2 weeks. Mike V • Talk 00:12, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Like Sibbs11 and Kris1016 (prev sock), this account is only involved in editing Mahto, removing sourced content and adding other, unreferenced (and slightly incoherent) text. When this account was brand new, they posted this, saying The editor of this community misbehaved with me 4-5 months before and he changed the irrelevant topics under this which has to be Sibbs11's edit warring to keep their preferred version of the article. ("The editor of this community" is presumably Utcursch, who has been the target of Sibbs11's and Sammi1011's disapproval:, .)

The writing style is identical as well - cf this recent post by Sibbs11 with this one. I think these diffs are duck-like behaviour, but would like a CU since there have been other socks before, so there may still be sleepers. bonadea contributions talk 19:42, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Adding. I thought their edits looked likely to be the same person but was not quite certain, but then I discovered this edit by the sockmaster - look at the second-to-last line and compare with the username Dineshmahto111 which amounts to a self-disclosure. Note: Dineshmahto111 is the oldest of these accounts. --bonadea contributions talk 20:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked and tagged. Good catch,. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)