Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dingbat2007/Archive

Report date October 19 2009, 04:15 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

This edit; see also Suspected sock puppets/Dingbat2007  — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 04:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by  — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by  — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 04:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests
 * see below for why. NW ( Talk ) 19:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * No need to continue this SPI; the IP is already blocked. NW ( Talk ) 19:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by WayKurat
Passes WP:DUCK test compared to User:Ricardojose20027. Both users had vandalized several television station articles and creates malicious redirects and previously deleted articles. Please note that the sockpuppet keeps on editing the sockmaster's userpage and talk page several times (see 1, 2, 3), and no offense, has that distinguishable "broken English" while posting comments on user pages and articles (see this previous version of Ricardojose20027's talk page and Vicecity-Dontknowisthatforevers's edits 1, 2, 3). -WayKurat (talk) 12:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by WayKurat (talk) 12:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC) Behavioral links seem pretty clear. Blocked and tagged as a sock of Dingbat2007. TN X Man 13:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

account blocked and tagged, autoblock will catch the IP. No need for CU. SpitfireTally-ho! 13:51, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

archived from Sockpuppet investigations/Ricardojose20027 SpitfireTally-ho! 13:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by WayKurat
Passes WP:DUCK test compared to sockmaster, especially to User:Ricardojose20027. Adds hoax information on several Philippine television related articles, and no offense, similar to Ricardojose20027 has bad grammar in English and Filipino. (See 1). Sockpuppet also edited the talk pages of blocked accounts, claiming that he will "unblock" them. This post in Filipino translates "I will unblock Dico Calingal, OK?" in English. Also, this simple talk page post automatically incriminates himself and admits that he is User:Ricardojose20027.

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Blocked by Tim Song.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 11:45, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

10 June 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Edits and behavior are similar to, which is a blocked sock puppet. ~ Nerdy Science Dude  (✉ • ✐) 00:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by ~ Nerdy Science Dude  (✉ • ✐)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Blocked and tagged Tim Song (talk) 01:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * User:InformationTimes talk page access revoked. Made some truly stupid attempt to get unblocked by leaving a fake message, which was apparently meant to come from an admin who promised to unblock him the next day. . Keep an eye out for these tricks while dealing with this sockmaster. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 09:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by AnmaFinotera
Same behaviors and exact same edits as the last identified sock, User:Deangelomywayentfans. Requesting check user for sleeper check and see if range block is possible. Even refers to himself by the name on his user page. --  AnmaFinotera (talk  ~ contribs ) 05:01, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Moneymafia/Archive, as well. —  Jeff G. ツ  05:03, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Moneymafia has been blocked indefinitely by. —  Jeff G. ツ  06:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * - Now THAT's evidence! :) Endorsing for a sleeper check. ( X!  ·  talk )  · @252  · 05:03, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅, no sleepers. --jpgordon:==( o ) 16:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh well. ( X! ·  talk )  · @716  · 16:11, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by WayKurat
His userpage says it all (WP:DUCK). Same contents of the user page compared to one of the previously blocked socks, User:InformationTimes and User:ExtraEdit. - WayKurat (talk) 10:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Pinasbida blocked and tagged. Favonian (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC)