Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dirk daenen/Archive

16 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

This edit from 78.23.123.143 had an inaccurate edit summary. This edit, from 78.23.119.182 to the same article, had a similarly inaccurate edit summary. After reverting both of the above IPs, Kand1nsk1, an editor I had never interacted with, reported me to the BLP noticeboard. In that same edit, Kand1nsk1 referenced creating the article, when in fact Dirk daenen had created the article. I have read the instructions on this page, but please let me know if I have forgotten to provide anything. Banana (talk) 23:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Based on behavior, I would say it's likely that the two IPs are Kand1nsk1, and based on the user's own edits, that he is Dirk daenen. Now having said that, we haven't seen any edits from the IPs recently, so I'm wondering if the editor was just logged out at the time. It also appears that the accused master has either retired or stopped using that username. As the revert war on the page has quieted, I'm inclined to close this case for now with no action taken. Of course, feel free to reopen should there be any new evidence. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

25 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Previous case closed to inactivity. This edit continues the pattern of misleading edit summaries. The user removes (rather than update) some information, which they state in their summary, but also removes unrelated information that had previously been a point of contention. The user is also putting their summaries on the talk page. I suspect the user will become inactive again as soon as someone comments on this. Banana (talk) 07:21, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Nothing has changed in this case since last time. Neither Dirk nor any of the IPs has edited; it's still all Kandinski. It looks like you guys are having a content dispute which is beyond the scope of SPI, so I'm not going to block based on that. Take it to WP:DR or something. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:11, 6 February 2011 (UTC)