Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Djquevedo/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All 3 4 accounts are WP:SPAs with one or two edits each, adding lengthy unsourced material to Cultural relativism, and all within the span of 2 hours. Crossroads -talk- 00:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

, you also reverted these accounts. FYI. Crossroads -talk- 00:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Just added the Jessica Orbe account, exact same pattern. Crossroads -talk- 03:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I would guess that these are copyright violations from some of the wording ('The course aims to familiarize students'), but I don't know what the source might be. - MrOllie (talk) 00:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
'''This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of her training as a clerk. Please allow her to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on her talk page or on this page.'''
 * The disruption seems to have stopped without any blocks, but since the master account went a whole two years between registration and editing, there's reason to think they might come back. Please block the three puppets as proven sox. I will give a uw-sock to the master, although I doubt that will have any bearing on whether they return to socking or not. If future disruption is this blatant, it can just be reported at WP:AIV. CU  since behavioral evidence was sufficient to block.  --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 07:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Administrative action is for now. I believe this is a class or similar (cf. The course aims to familiarize students... at ). Even if this is a single person, they seem to be making a good faith effort to add content – we should try talking to them before making any sort of administrative intervention.  --Blablubbs (talk) 08:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, I'm supposed to be the AGF-y one and you're supposed to be the cynical one! But yeah, good catch. Situation I hadn't encountered yet. A good reminder to all of us to assume good faith. Also, to the filer, just a reminder to not check the "request CU" box without giving a reason for the request. Anyways, uw-agf-assign all around; closing. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 08:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)