Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dojarca/Archive

14 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

this, posting as Dojarca while logged in as MathFacts Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 16:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Dojarca must have an opportunity to respond, as any other user in any other sockpuppet investigation. I suggest to unblock him and allow him to respond. Perhaps there is a security problem and he fell a victim of impostor, or maybe he has more accounts and wants to declare them? Biophys (talk) 16:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Also, perhaps run a full checkuser just in case there are more sockpuppets? The original posting is somewhat ambiguous and may actually indicate that MathFacts is sock of an another user, who was recently banned from the arbitration enforcement for two months. Or, to get really nasty-minded, MathFacts may be even just an evil throwaway account with no relation to Dojarca, who just wanted to see Dojarca banned and discredited. -- Sander Säde 16:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, if it was indeed him, the facts that he submitted AE requests from several accounts and proposed acting as a proxy for another user  are worrisome and need a checkuser investigation.Biophys (talk) 18:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Dojarca is blocked for two weeks, MathFacts block is permanent. The length of Dojarca's block was determined by the initial offense, and should be changed if there is more. Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 16:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me. Procedural close. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

With regards to the above concerns, the two accounts are indeed ✅ to be from the same person. –MuZemike 18:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)