Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Doncsecz/Archive

24 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The sock was reactivated today after a break.

The sockmaster is currently blocked and he already has a confirmed sock (User:GyorgyFerenc). (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stubes99)

Arguments for Laszlovszky András as sock of Doncsecz: interest in the discussion about the role of Hungary in the Battle of Raab. (see Talk:Napoleonic_Wars - where both posted  and . - he also edited there under the ip http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/145.236.101.149.

Another argument: posting of messages (in Hungarian language) on Hungarian users' talk pages asking for help (see ) Jorgeegroj (talk) 16:48, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Another evident IP sock appeared:. It contiuned the discussion at Talk:Napoleonic Wars and posted a message on User talk:Fakirbakir (also in Hungarian), just like 145.236.101.149 before Jorgeegroj (talk) 20:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Laszlovszky András is an editor on the huwiki since 2009. He is mostly editing articles related to ancient history (hittites and so on), while Doncsecz is mainly preoccupied with the history of the modern era and history of the Slovenian minority in Hungary. Laszlovszky András is a member of the ArbCom on the Hungarian Wikipedia since 2010. I'm convinced he's not a sockpuppet at all. --Hkoala (talk) 12:48, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

I am an administrator on Hungarian Wikipedia and it is sure that they are two separate persons. I happen to know Doncsecz on Facebook and he is surely not Laszlovszky who is a member of Hungarian ArbCom since 2010 as Hkoala said. They also edit different topics and their use of English is also different. I would be rather interested in Jorgeegroj whose first edit was to make a wild accusation on such weak evidences. Laci.d (talk) 13:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

I can only support my colleagues up here. I am also an admin since 2006 on huwiki, know Laslovszky personally, and also know Doncsecz through pictures on facebook and other media. It is even nonsense to raise this, there is such a great difference between the areas of excellence of the two editors. An identity check surely can reveal the truth, but I find it unfounded. --171.19.1.50 (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC)--Burumbátor (talk) 13:21, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

This throws me. Laszlovszky András (talk) 14:36, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  13:26, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Closing as no action taken.
 * For the record, is ✅ to Doncsecz (per the other case listed above). --  DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  11:51, 27 September 2012 (UTC)