Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Donutsareverygood/Archive

27 August 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Purple&diff=prev&oldid=677036160 One example] of an edit by Donutsareverygood prior to being indef blocked for vandalism. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BethNaught&diff=prev&oldid=677037343 Another pre-block example.] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Orange_(colour)&diff=prev&oldid=677036619 And another.] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Purple&diff=prev&oldid=677813455 First edit by Pineapplesilove] (to same article) which was created after Donutsareverygood was blocked. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yellow&diff=prev&oldid=677813697 Second (and most recent) edit] by Pineapplesilove which shows continuing vandalism. I think the behavioral evidence will establish the link without relying on IP evidence, but I can see that checking the IP address may help connect this vandal to other accounts or previous SPI reports as well. In any case, I believe that the style and content of the edits, combined with the second account being created after the first was blocked, is consistent enough to show a connection between the accounts. Etamni &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 08:37, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * The following accounts are ✅ but behavioral evidence doesn’t support a block at this point. They should be watched:
 * I'm blocking any accounts that are not already blocked without Talk page access. This follows the lead of, who has done most of the blocking, and makes sense to me given the nature of the master.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * All done. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ but behavioral evidence doesn’t support a block at this point. They should be watched:
 * I'm blocking any accounts that are not already blocked without Talk page access. This follows the lead of, who has done most of the blocking, and makes sense to me given the nature of the master.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * All done. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ but behavioral evidence doesn’t support a block at this point. They should be watched:
 * I'm blocking any accounts that are not already blocked without Talk page access. This follows the lead of, who has done most of the blocking, and makes sense to me given the nature of the master.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * All done. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm blocking any accounts that are not already blocked without Talk page access. This follows the lead of, who has done most of the blocking, and makes sense to me given the nature of the master.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * All done. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm blocking any accounts that are not already blocked without Talk page access. This follows the lead of, who has done most of the blocking, and makes sense to me given the nature of the master.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * All done. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 10:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)