Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Doughnuthead/Archive

Report date December 20 2009, 18:57 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

The master account was blocked one week for socking, but now has come back on an IP address 78.144.87.71. This Diff shows that it's him. Momo san Gespräch 18:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Momo san  Gespräch


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Personally, I'm not sure. He hasn't logged on as Doughnuthead and Doughnuthead said (while logged in) that he was retiring. Regardless, it's a waste of everyone's time dealing with whoever this is. -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 19:41, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users

Requested by Momo san  Gespräch 18:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

Judging from MuZemike, all the IP ranges are very dynamic so rangeblocks may not be possible. Momo san Gespräch 19:10, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

– I don't see what good a CheckUser is going to do in this case, given the IP-hopping. They're also clear socks. I'm welcome to any other suggestions for dealing with this one. –MuZemike 20:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

I'll keep an eye on this and see what I can do. –MuZemike 21:09, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

16 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets

This user has declared to have many other accounts to be used for vandalism, I believe a checkuser check for sleepers would be appropriate. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - --  DQ  (t)   (e)  14:57, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

The three accounts in ALL CAPS are ✅, all others are fairly obvious socks. All accounts look like they're Doughnuthead's. –MuZemike 19:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

05 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

ScottishChav110's first edit claims to be Doughnuthead; Doughnutheadthe2nd's name + the fact that one of his four edits was to revert ScottishChav110's edit suggest he is also Doughnuthead. I indef-blocked the former, and declined an unblock request for the latter, but it may be worth Checkusering to see if there are any other obvious socks. Philosopher Let us reason together. 13:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - The master is stale, but the latter two socks aren't. Endorsing to see if they're connected, and if there are sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Obvious socks, did a check to see if there were any sleepers per the history and open intention to sock. Nothing else to report. WilliamH (talk) 14:32, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

29 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Making edits that say things like "Doughnuthead reigns supreme". I presume the original is stale, but there might be matches to other known Doughnuthead socks, and if these two new ones really are Doughnuthead, there might be sleepers. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, since I reported these, there has been an apparent confession at User talk:HappySadJunkie - but there must still be a strong possibility of socks sleepers -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following are ✅ matches behaviourally and/or technically:
 * . WilliamH (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * . WilliamH (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * . WilliamH (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * . WilliamH (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

02 July 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User has admitted to having been indefinitely blocked. An edit to help desk claims his brother got his IP blocked. He has since made edits to two talk pages referencing another user he says is blocked, Donuthead, at MuZmike and theJadeFalcon. His user page admits his original account is indef blocked. -- ferret (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Added FunBear77, which I believe may be the user's original indef blocked account. Block messages at User talk:FunBear77 suggest FunBear77 admitted to also being Donuthead. -- ferret (talk)
 * Reply to Nawlin: That makes sense in context to FunBear's talk page comment that "I am Donuthead (but the UK spelling)" -- ferret (talk) 18:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm confident that GodofUndead30 and FunBear77 are banned User:Doughnuthead. Oddly enough, I don't think User:Donuthead is the same person - it's a dormant account from 2007.  If that account were in fact Doughnuthead, I suspect he would have used it by now.  NawlinWiki (talk) 18:16, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Closing per Nawlin. Elockid  ( Talk ) 01:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * FunBear77 and GodofUndead30 tagged  S ven M anguard   Wha?  04:33, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

23 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I am confessing to owning all of these accounts. This is a self made confession. 80.42.8.128 (talk) 11:56, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Already blocked. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  15:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)