Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dpindia/Archive

Evidence submitted by Wuhwuzdat
Long term sock farming, all SPA's editing Satish Jha, and related articles Wuh  Wuz  Dat  04:41, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims. Wuhwuzdat is clearly making wild allegations. Just saw this page. Going by the names, all the people seem to be real. Wuhwuzdat is highly motivated and should not be allowed to comment on this page at all. He seems to have some inherent bias.

Wuhwuzdat, please note that wiki is about openness and you are working from behind the cloak and using some powers you acquired just the same way a small government official uses to harass citizens. Most of the "socks" you have identified should take umbrage over your observations but you are hiding somewhere and using power rather than reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adhikaris (talk • contribs) 03:46, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment, a proper defense does not consist of "making wild allegations" against the editor who started this investigation. Any "Inherent bias" I have on this issue is due to my bias against Sockpuppetry, Conflict Of Interest, POV editing, and stealthy efforts at self promotion by the articles subject. This case may be related to A previous sock puppetry case involving related articles. Please note the similarities (notably, the bizarre grammar and verbal attacks) in the "wild accusations" by the accused to the talk page comments found at Talk:Satish Ja.  Wuh  Wuz  Dat  14:07, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * There is a clear connection between Adhikaris, Mhrdreader, and Wikicrawlerone from behavioral evidence at the talk page. Blurpeace  21:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I have blocked the three recent accounts with clear connections; the others are stale and have insufficient evidence to warrant a sockpuppet block. Please report the accounts if they begin editing again. Blurpeace  10:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)