Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr.Koo/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both users are currently engaged in a discussion after an edit war, have rather similar opinions, and both seems to have a very similar style of editing by repeatedly making changes to articles at least more than 8 times constantly for each article. Contributions Here and Here. A recent edit made by User:Dr.khatmando were just minutes away from an edit (revert) by User:Dr.Koo; and seems to be a form of Meat puppetry. Not to mention both users have similar names. TheInfernoX (talk) 18:48, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
❌. Closing with no action. As an aside, Dr.khatmando is the older account.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pretty clear sock of the indeffed account with overlapping interests editing articles about China and Japan. _dk (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Please indef the sock. Cabayi (talk) 20:15, 21 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The same (unblocked) sock seems to be at work on zh:. The master's block log there (log) refers to who isn't blocked here but was blocked there (log)  just over two hours earlier for 3 months as a vandal, and shares the same edit interests. I'd like some input from someone who understands Chinese (...if only  hadn't stepped back from SPI, *cough, cough*) . Cabayi (talk) 20:44, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Blocked "Dr.Koo 2nd". ST47 (talk) 21:27, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * What do you want me to look at? The zhwiki blocks (also including ) are apparently based on a behavioral analysis documented at zh:Wikipedia:当前的破坏/存档/2019年5月. That analysis (based on content and timing of edits and lack of edit summaries) looks plausible on its face, but I haven't really spent much time looking into it. T. Canens (talk) 01:08, 22 October 2019 (UTC)