Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr.Mukesh111/Archive

Evidence submitted by Yworo
Made pretty much the same edits as the last sock,, diff. Yworo (talk) 14:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

It also looks like there are two suspected socks tagged on their talk pages which have never been blocked: Yworo (talk) 15:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)



Evidence submitted by Active Banana
These edits as a perfect match of edits made by other socks on this article.  Active  Banana   (  bananaphone  19:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Due to the number of accounts involved a sleeper check would be good. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 18:05, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

✅ =

J.delanoy gabs adds 18:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked, marking for close. TN X Man  19:08, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Adding, as a confirmed account. TN X Man  20:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by NativeForeigner
Contribs in general. I'm familiar with the case, obvious quacking with edits to playback singer. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 00:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * - Would like another sleeper check on this account. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 00:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

✅ that are all the same person as, and by extension. Amalthea 09:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Accounts blocked and tagged according to CU results; closing case. Blurpeace  10:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Gogo Dodo
Account blocked per WP:DUCK. Requesting sleeper check. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
✅
 * -- TN X Man 20:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * -- TN X Man 20:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * -- TN X Man 20:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * -- TN X Man 20:36, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Was doing it concurrently, here's some more, ✅ to match the last batch: Amalthea 20:40, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked the unblocked ones and tagged Bsadowski1 20:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Marked for close. TN X Man  22:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Gogo Dodo
Both accounts blocked per WP:DUCK. Requesting sleeper check and possibility of longer block of underlying IP or range. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 15:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
(Copying my comment from ANI) ✅
 * However, a rangeblock isn't very feasible - it's a wide range and there are quite a few legitimate accounts that would be caught up in it. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  16:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * However, a rangeblock isn't very feasible - it's a wide range and there are quite a few legitimate accounts that would be caught up in it. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  16:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * However, a rangeblock isn't very feasible - it's a wide range and there are quite a few legitimate accounts that would be caught up in it. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  16:28, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Retagged two users with the CU verified tag. All blocked + all tagged = Nothing else to do. -- DQ  (t)  (e)  20:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Acroterion
Following up on WP:ANI, the subject appears to be evading the rangeblocks placed by Antandrus with limited success, probably using a public computer or a friend, since the 180 ISP is different (only two of the previous 154 range listed, a more complete range is at the ANI report). All originate in Pakistan. Has been following around reverting his edits and leaving abusive summaries, then latched onto me after I started blocking IPs, and has been following  now. Antandrus rangeblocked 119.154.32.0/19, 119.154.96.0/19, 119.154.128.0/21 for a while, those are due to expire. Check for leakage and new ranges, please.  Acroterion  (talk)  21:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * More popping up, all blocked.  Acroterion  (talk)  04:36, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Auto-generated every six hours.
 * User compare report

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
This appears to be a returning vandal, and the case probably needs to be filed there. In any case, the following are ✅:
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a whole lot of (already blocked) socks. No comment on the IPs. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 18:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Blocked by Dragonfly. Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  19:11, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Acroterion
New socks following same pattern of reversion and "ur mom" silliness, recently created.  Acroterion  (talk)  19:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Auto-generated every six hours.
 * User compare report

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
✅ plus:



Underlying /16 range blocked 1 week. –MuZemike 19:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

04 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

A focus on playback singers. Repeated random reversions of edits I've made to various articles. Just like Dr.Mukesh111. Geniac (talk) 03:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - A bunch of those are blocked already for being probable sockpuppet accounts, but getting double confirmation on them would be good. And a check for sleepers is probably needed here too. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 06:04, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following are the same:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:30, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

04 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Blocked per WP:DUCK. Requesting a sleeper check. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:23, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Another sock a few hours later, doing the same reversion of editors who've banned or reverted him recently. Already blocked, again may be worth checking/banning the IP. McGeddon (talk) 22:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Sigh, a new account four hours after the last check. May as well take another look, I guess? —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:04, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 23:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 23:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 23:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

05 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Being used to re-perform edits that have been undone and redone by other known sockpuppets on Blackout. d m  z  18:44, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
checked and confirmed in the case below SpitfireTally-ho! 20:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

05 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Evident sock. Requesting CU to check for sleepers. -- Addi hockey  10 e-mail 18:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree. There's many, many more; he's creating them and using them within a few minutes of creation.  His MO is to go through the recent history of people who are reverting or blocking him, and reverting their most recent edits in a (rather pointless) attempt to harass.  Antandrus  (talk) 18:58, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
This is getting ridiculous. Anyways, here's the latest ✅ list:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 19:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

11 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same MO. Any sleepers? Geniac (talk) 00:24, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
for a sleeper check/check for any missed accounts. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#A40000;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 00:33, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * These three accounts are ✅ as being the same person and match to Dr.Mukesh111:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 04:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 04:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 04:04, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

All accounts blocked and tagged. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#A40000;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 04:12, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

15 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same MO. Any sleepers? Geniac (talk) 03:17, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - May as well. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:55, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following are the same:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

17 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Opening based on a comment left on my talk page. Same MO. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:57, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Also: --Geniac (talk) 05:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following are the same:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All have been blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)  (e)  23:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All have been blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)  (e)  23:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All have been blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)  (e)  23:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All have been blocked and tagged. -- DQ  (t)  (e)  23:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

17 December 2010



 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Per duckActive Banana    (bananaphone  23:24, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

--Geniac (talk) 02:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Case formatted. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#A40000;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 13:13, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

All accounts have been blocked and tagged. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#A40000;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 13:17, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

19 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

See contributions, which are substantially identical to User:Lukonefoty, who was also blocked as a sock.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  20:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following are the same:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 20:34, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I've just rolled back User:Raboj23's edits since it's a banned user (and they were vandalism anyway, it seemed). I was about to tag the userpages as being confirmed socks but I assume it's preferred that an admin does so when blocking, so enjoy.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  21:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 20:34, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I've just rolled back User:Raboj23's edits since it's a banned user (and they were vandalism anyway, it seemed). I was about to tag the userpages as being confirmed socks but I assume it's preferred that an admin does so when blocking, so enjoy.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  21:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

21 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Blocked per WP:DUCK. Requesting sleeper check. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All ✅, plus
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 02:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. For now, anyway. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. For now, anyway. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

21 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Today's accounts: standard sock sweep.  Acroterion  (talk)  13:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All ✅, plus. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:56, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged those not already done. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  16:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

27 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same MO. Sleepers? Geniac (talk) 23:59, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - 100% sure all are socks, regardless of technical evidence. Still sleeper check please. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:39, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No comment on the IP, but the following are ✅ as being the same person:


 * 06:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * 06:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * 06:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * 06:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged them all. Courcelles 06:03, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

30 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same MO. Any sleepers? Geniac (talk) 01:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked, keeping open for a sleeper check. Nakon  01:21, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * - NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 03:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Nothing else on that range, from what I can see. –MuZemike 23:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

31 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

More of the same. Sleepers? Geniac (talk) 00:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All blocked. This time, underlying range blocked 2 weeks. –MuZemike 01:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

01 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same thing. Any sleepers? Range block? Geniac (talk) 14:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Endorsing for sleepers and possible rangeblock. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅, but no sleepers this time. Cool Hand Luke 02:19, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. Closing. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:56, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

05 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same thing. Sleepers? Range block? Geniac (talk) 01:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - See above. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:03, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following are the same person:

The range is showing as a /13, so that's out. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 03:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

07 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

More of the same. Sleeper check requested. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both users already blocked.  Nakon  06:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following are the same:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:17, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

09 January 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same junk. Sleepers? Rangeblock? Geniac (talk) 02:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Let's take a look. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:58, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following:


 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 14:39, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 15:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

13 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Likely sockpuppets per WP:DUCK. Requesting confirmation and CU for sleepers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Evidence submitted by Shshshsh
Other socks: Shahid •  Talk 2 me  08:50, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Summary confirm/sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 05:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Surprise, surprise, there's a bunch of socks. Here are the ✅ matches:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note - new sock created. . Blocked and tagged. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 16:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note - new sock created. . Blocked and tagged. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 16:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note - new sock created. . Blocked and tagged. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 16:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note - new sock created. . Blocked and tagged. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 16:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 15:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note - new sock created. . Blocked and tagged. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 16:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note - new sock created. . Blocked and tagged. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 16:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

14 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Blocked per WP:DUCK. Requesting another sleeper check. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The following accounts are ✅ matches:
 * Unfortunately, a rangeblock is a no-go. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  17:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. Thank you.  Unfortunate about the range block. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, a rangeblock is a no-go. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  17:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. Thank you.  Unfortunate about the range block. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, a rangeblock is a no-go. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  17:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. Thank you.  Unfortunate about the range block. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

14 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Same edits: undoing my own edits and writing some nasty insults like "Shshsh is my son" Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  20:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All three are ✅. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 20:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

15 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Blocked per the usual. Requesting sleeper check. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
All three ✅. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 16:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I changed the tagging on the three accounts. A fourth and fifth just appeared.  No sleepers around? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:26, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Not at the moment. The two you added are ✅. This guy switches between a few ISPs. The one he is bouncing around now is a very large (and busy) range, unfortunately. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  17:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I re-tagged the other two. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:57, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

16 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Per the usual. Sleeper check last time didn't reveal anything, but maybe this time? (Wishful thinking) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 04:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * One sleeper found, . Tiptoety  talk 05:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Everyone's blocked, marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  12:50, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

17 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Another day, another set of socks. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:53, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' All users are blocked and tagged, marking case as closed. -- Addi hockey  10  e-mail 18:36, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The listed accounts are ✅, no other accounts at the moment. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 13:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

18 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

WP:DUCK, the same edits of reverting me and my edits and posting some terrible insults. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  12:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Another morning, another batch of socks. All ✅ matches:
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 12:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 12:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 12:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 12:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

17 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Undoubtedly another sock. Vandalism edits and the same obsession of undoing my edits without a reason. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  21:54, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Account is already blocked, but I'm endorsing for a sleeper check. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 23:49, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Where there's one, there's a million more. ✅ the following:
 * Those are the ones I feel comfortable identifying at the moment. This is a popular ISP and a common useragent, so the possibility of false positives is higher than normal. If another CU would like to weigh in, that's fine, but I know this guy will be back. I figure we'll feed him the rope and let him ID his socks for us. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  02:05, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Those are the ones I feel comfortable identifying at the moment. This is a popular ISP and a common useragent, so the possibility of false positives is higher than normal. If another CU would like to weigh in, that's fine, but I know this guy will be back. I figure we'll feed him the rope and let him ID his socks for us. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  02:05, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Those are the ones I feel comfortable identifying at the moment. This is a popular ISP and a common useragent, so the possibility of false positives is higher than normal. If another CU would like to weigh in, that's fine, but I know this guy will be back. I figure we'll feed him the rope and let him ID his socks for us. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  02:05, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All have been blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

22 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

WP:DUCK - the same edits, which means, reverting mine for no reason, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  22:46, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Self endorsing for a sleeper check. <b style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:14px; color:#4682B4;">Elockid</b>  ( Talk ) 01:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ the following:


 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 12:51, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All confirmed socks have been blocked and tagged, and the autoblock has been kicked on. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man 12:51, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All confirmed socks have been blocked and tagged, and the autoblock has been kicked on. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

25 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

User:Shahidki mamein registered and immediately started reverting edits by User:Shshshsh, which is exactly the same pattern as User:Ghari Jawoon a few days ago, and the latter is a confirmed sock of Dr.Mukesh111. I've indef blocked, but would like a check for confirmation -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:58, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Added User:Atob oony who has also just registered and started reverting User:Shshshsh ( not blocked) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Added User:Untraptant who has also just registered and started reverting User:Shshshsh ( not blocked) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:07, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ all three. Dominic·t 11:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, all 3 blocked and tagged -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:25, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  17:47, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

28 April 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Blocked per WP:DUCK. Requesting sleeper check. Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Sleeper blocked and tagged, other account retagged. Thank you! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:16, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * - Customary sleeper check. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Just added Jamiawala, as I think it's likely. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:13, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus Shahidkima ki bund and Love n only love. JamiawalaJamiawala is ❌. Dominic·t 03:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

May I ask why we are not semi or even full-protecting the affecting articles here? –MuZemike 06:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

There have been 34 SPI cases on this case alone since past August, mind everyone. I ask again: Why are we not protecting anything here?? –MuZemike 06:24, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Because Dr.Mukesh111 is following Shshshsh around wherever they go. So unless we want to semi-protect every article that Shshshsh edits, I don't think it would be possible.  An edit filter might be an option.  I've thought of what might work, but it has been awhile since I have written a new edit filter and things have become more advanced.  Perhaps I could add it, leave it disabled, and then notify other edit filter managers on my proposed filter. I saved a disabled filter and requested feedback. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, I've protected Rani Mukerji. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:11, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Marking for close. TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  13:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

09 October 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

It's been a long time, I thought the user got tired, but I think he's far sneakier than expected. The first user seems like someone who clearly has had a history on Wikipedia, does not at all seem like a new account. When I checked their history I found out he reverted me on one of the articles on which I reverted one of Mukesh's socks. Anyway, I think a check is necessary. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  20:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Due to my recent edits on Shreya Ghoshal and Asha Bhosle, editor Shshshsh forgot the policy about assuming good faith because he is an admirer of Asha Bhosley which he mentioned on his user page also. I only tagged unsourced statement and this false accusation is beyond my perception. I am only trying to fight vandalism. Usvi Kasine (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If it isn't you, then you have no reason to be concerned. This investigation has got nothing to do with your tagging. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  22:40, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not at all concerned about your accusations. I am just trying to establish a fact about your nature of bad faith. The time I tagged Asha Bhosle, you lost good faith as you are a fan of this singer. Usvi Kasine (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Good for you. I do not assume bad faith, but I'd thank you if you did not try to analyse my "nature" with irrelevant accusations, which constitute a better example of bad faith. That's not the place to do it, not that other places on Wikipedia are. Thanks. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  23:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not trying to accuse you of anything. But being an experienced editor, you must maintain a neutral point of view and do think sometime why its you who has issues with everyone. Regards. Usvi Kasine (talk) 23:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The master is stale, but I'm endorsing to see if these three are the same, and if there are any sleepers. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:08, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I've got good news and bad news. The bad news is that the technical evidence isn't going to be much of a help, especially since everything is stale. I can tell you that Guhang66 is not geographically close to the other two. The other two are in the same area, which (and I'm going by memory here) was the same area Mukesh was in.
 * The good news is that I found a large group of unrelated spam accounts, which I've blocked. So, I guess it's a wash? TN <b style="color:midnightblue; font-size:larger;">X</b> Man  00:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * "The other two are in the same area, which (and I'm going by memory here) was the same area Mukesh was in." - so what's going to be done with that? created an account around the same time the last sock of Mukesh got blocked. Checking his earliest edits, it was clear that he was familiar with the process of Wikipedia editing. He edited pages which were earlier edited by Mukesh (of mainly Pakistani singers) and his socks, including Mohammad Ali (actor), Saleem Raza and he undid my revert of Mukesh's sock  on Zeba (see diff). The fact that he comes from the same area as Mukesh makes matters even more suspicious. If I remember it right, Mukesh's IP started with "119...". Can there be made another check with some of Mukesh's last socks or something of this sort?  Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  00:38, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The last account we have that was tagged as a sock of DrMukesh is, and that was from five and a half months ago - which is beyond the range we can check. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe there's one more because I remember he harrassed me just a few months back. Let me look for it. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  00:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe some attempt to check them against the following socks:, , could help? Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  11:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Blocked and tagged the two. The behavioral evidence, geolocation/range are sufficient to block these two as socks of the community banned editor. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  11:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)