Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr. Tariq Nayfeh/Archive

Report date April 28 2009, 01:08 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Dawn Bard (talk)

User:Dr. Tariq Nayfeh was blocked earlier today for edit-warring and deleting sourced content without explanation on Physician:, , (and more), at Osteotomy, including ,  (and more). User:Mtpisaman has since shown up and repeatedly reverted back to User:Dr. Tariq Nayfeh's edits, including:, , , , , , ,.


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Seems obvious to me. Could an admin block the sock please? Canadian  Nine  01:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions
 * Sock blocked indef, main account warned. ——  nix eagle email me 02:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Sock tagged, archiving. —  Jake   Wartenberg  02:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Report date April 28 2009, 11:16 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by Verbal   chat

User was blocked yesterday and found to be using the sockpuppet. Another editor has appeared reverting to these editors preferred versions, called. See Sockpuppet_investigations/Dr._Tariq_Nayfeh/Archive for previous case. Also see, same behaviour as other accounts. Verbal  chat  11:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I forgot about, who has been blocked for a short period for edit warring the same edits as the accounts above. Verbal   chat  11:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This seems to be ongoing, probably needs an IP (range?) block and some attention.  Verbal   chat  11:30, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

And  Verbal   chat  13:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users
 * I blocked User:DeLaughterDO for repeatedly blanking material after warnings, before I became aware of these allegations. The pattern for all these users is the same: removal of material in medical articles, and blanking their user pages after warnings left. —  Tivedshambo   (t/c) 11:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Fixed the tagging on all accounts blocked to link here. Also, CU did not confirm in this case as far as I can tell.  Syn  ergy 16:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * User User:Prdentiol has just come out of the woodwork to revert Nurse practitioner back to User:Mtpisaman's version. Mtpisaman has already been indefinitely blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Dr. Tariq Nayfeh. Dawn Bard (talk) 13:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Prdentiol blocked too. BencherliteTalk 13:10, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

No-brainer--all blocked indef, plus Blueboy96 13:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions
 * Please tag and archive ——  nix eagle email me 16:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Report date June 10 2009, 19:32 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Reverting to same version of the article as Dr. Tariq Nayfeh and his sockpuppets. Passes (fails?) the WP:DUCK test. Verbal  chat  19:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Verbal   chat


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

New user whose first and only edits to physician page, revert/edit warrior and refused to use the talk page. Fuzbaby (talk) 19:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users

See Sockpuppet investigations/Dr. Tariq Nayfeh/Archive; I would say that Dr. Tariq Nayfeh is the puppetmaster, and Sogsw is just a(nother) puppet. Dawn Bard (talk) 19:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I got them backwards in the form - sorry about that. Can a clerk fix? Verbal   chat  20:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's a big deal - I just wanted to make sure that the link to the other SPI was here for the admins to see. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Mered from Sockpuppet investigations/Sogsw. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 21:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Note: Blocked and tagged. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 21:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions

Report date June 11 2009, 15:33 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Continuing yesterdays socking, same edit, same edit summary. WP:DUCK Verbal   chat  15:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Verbal   chat


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Adding User:Suersimmons, same edits to Physician, quack, quack. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments by other users
 * ✅ Peter Symonds ( talk ) 15:48, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


 * Conclusions

Blocked and tagged. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 15:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)