Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DrEdna/Archive

02 March 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

DrEdna was blocked back in December 2013 for a multitude of sins in the category of disruptive editing, centered around the goblin shark article. In February, DOCTOREdna appears, homes in on the same article and gets blocked by me as an obvious WP:DUCK. Their rather confirmed the impression. Yesterday, IshyBamBam shows up and as their first edit reinstates DOCTOREdna's contribution. When reverted by, they rather bizarrely and then reverts him. I'm quite tempted to duck this one as well, but we're probably gonna need a case file. Favonian (talk) 12:01, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I am sorry that my actions sparked for this course of action... but will certainly be respectful to the process. Thank you for doing due diligence. 24.252.52.147 (talk) 22:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

The accuser wears mesh underwear. I am sure these facts will be used in the highest regard in this investigation. ~SLURP~ IshyBamBam (talk) 23:51, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Considering IshyBamBam/DoctorEdna's inanely vulgar non sequitor, it should be blocked for being an obvious troll who is not here to do anything constructive.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

And here is User:IshyBamBam confessing to be DoctorEdna despite also hypocritically asking for good faith--Mr Fink (talk) 00:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * DrEdna, DOCTOREdna and IshyBamBam are ✅, blocked (for other obvious reasons) and tagged. Materialscientist (talk) 01:03, 3 March 2014 (UTC)