Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Janet Fairweather/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Potential COI editing @ St Peter-in-Ely. RG and KS have similar usernames, and DJF has the same pattern of edit summaries as RG. 0x Deadbeef →∞ (talk to me) 12:53, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I'm leaning towards a duck block (see ). Requesting a check. MarioGom (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - are any of their edits problematic? This could easily be three clerics/scholars working at the same place. They may need to make some COI declarations, but before I start running checks and applying blocks, I want to know whether there is any evidence of disruption. Sure they're editing the same articles - but are they edit warring through the accounts, backing each other up in conversations, or similar? Girth Summit  (blether)  19:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I checked because using multiple accounts to revert the same content and a third one to make an RFPP filing for the page in question would have been deceptive (even if the actual revert is justified, which I don't dispute), cf. . They are most likely three distinct individuals. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks Blablubbs. I don't think that any action is needed here beyond a pointer towards our COI guidance. I'll do a personalised note tomorrow (as an editor with an interest in articles about historic churches) if nobody beats me to it. Girth Summit  (blether)  21:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Closing per . Thanks, Spicy (talk) 19:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)