Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Karl fan/Archive

07 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

&tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 11:30, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  14:00, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * - There is no evidence to support a checkuser request which must be in diffs. Also, I don't see that they are the same editors. Why do you think they are?


 * Vandalism targeting the same article, . Speaking of which, I could add:


 * and


 * Who seem to be the latest socks. &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 10:03, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


 * And another one:
 * ..? &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 13:56, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ..? &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 13:56, 10 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The mere fact of vandalising the same article is not sufficient grounds to suspect sockpuppetry: many articles attract frequent vandalism. However, the article Karl Kruszelnicki has recently been subject to vandalism from a number of single-purpose vandalism only accounts and IP addresses, in a way that looks like a coordinated attack by many different people. The article has been semiprotected for a week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesBWatson (talk • contribs) 06:54, 13 November 2012‎ (UTC)
 * The fact that there has been such activity on an otherwise infrequently edited article, where there is no significant news mentions or what have you to actually instigate such attacks would suggest that this is a WP:DUCK. Saying "many different people" is really stretching AGF. But, whatever. &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 09:43, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

18 November 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets






 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

These accounts and IP have been persistently vandalising. All accounts are VOA's, targeting only the Karl Kruszelnicki page. The article was protected until the 15th, during which time the socks targeted the talk page. The protection has since been lifted, and the socks have moved back to vandalising the article. A couple of accounts are banned, but it hasn't stopped the vandalism. It's a duck if ever I saw/heard one. &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 02:58, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Added Mr Sigmund Freud who appears to be the new incarnation. &tilde;danjel [ talk &#124; contribs ] 03:53, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged the accounts. Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * - - Is it possible to rangeblock this since the user won't stop returning? Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:04, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ is also the same. Unfortunately, no rangeblock will be possible. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:53, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll add that there appear to be no unblocked accounts at this time. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 23:55, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Nothing left to do but sweep up and tag the last one. Closing. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 23:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)