Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drjdemornay/Archive

22 December 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All these (listed in order of creation) are SPAs who have for five years been trying to insert into the article Rebecca De Mornay information about supposed step-brothers which is (a) completely unsourced, (b) apparently being added for promotional purposes (e.g. here and here), and (c) even if reliably sourced, irrelevant to an article about Ms De Mornay and her career.

Two step-brothers are mentioned, but the main focus is on Jonathan, who was introduced by Fidelio11 here, promoted to multi-millionnaire by Fidelio10 here and to billionnaire by Monaco1112 here. Whenever the information has been removed, more SPAs have appeared to re-insert it. Most recently Robertj290 has been blocked a second time for edit-warring.

Their persistence may be explained by this edit summary and this book extract, both from 2011.

Drjdemornay is blocked as a precaution against impersonation and for legal threats (see ANI), and Jdmprivate as a corporate account.

These accounts are no doubt mostly stale for CU, but seem to me fairly loudly-quacking DUCKs; I am raising this report as a base for further reports in view of their persistence. JohnCD (talk) 18:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Based on duck, I've indeffed all of the previously unblocked accounts, and tagged all of the accounts. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:41, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

26 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edited Rebecca de Mornay claiming to be the subject, with edit summary including: "MY BROTHER 'S ARTICLES HAVE BEEN ON HERE FOR MANY YEARS AND THAT SHOULD BE SHOWN". JohnCD (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Already blocked, and invited to contact OTRS, by. Reported for the record. JohnCD (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2015 (UTC)