Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drjonnafreyfuss/Archive

07 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Drjonnafreyfuss created an article on a DJ here. The user went on to remove speedy nominations from the article 4 times, , , and. Then the brand new account Mriloveford was created and has been editing as an SPA on the same article adding questionable sources such as and. Then the anon IP editor 174.234.67.106 has taken an interest in the same article as an SPA including removing the speedy nomination yet again. This appears to be a sock/meat with the intent of promoting the Buddy Holly (disk jockey) article and circumventing the speedy deletion process on it as well. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I checked this just as this case was being written, and, unfortunately, they seem ❌. --MuZemike 20:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Closing without action AGK  [•] 21:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

07 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Another SPA Anon IP has popped up removing the same speedy. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Added Mrdeliveryguy, another SPA on the same page. Hairhorn (talk) 02:23, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

09 June 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Adding yet another SPA anon IP which has now removed the AfD notice on the same article, and also created an AfC discussion to create a similarly named article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:01, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Addressing both open SPIs: Both IPs look ducky, but not sure of the point of blocking. It has been a couple of days since they have edited, I removed the one comment at AFD via WP:GODWIN, and likely the problem will take care of it self for this SPA. The named account may just be a meatpuppet, no way to be sure without CU and I would likely not endorse for this small of an issue that is likely to resolve itself when the AFD closes. If the IPs do edit again, I would be inclined to block. Both IPs are static. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;   &copy;  20:51, 10 June 2012 (UTC)