Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drshaziarehman/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Similar behavior at one article and also similar contrib summaries, all share motivation to keep article yet they casually work together simultaneously. SwisterTwister  talk  19:57, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Well, there's this and this for example and none of the sources ever mention this. Likewise, the first one contains clear promotionalism as is this and this, the latter having other accounts repeating it. They could easily be hired employees but the closeness of too suspicious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister (talk • contribs)


 * Not SwisterTwister, but there's also the fact that both (along with other SPAs) commented at the sockfest Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Mohsin_Nawaz. All use the same clipped overly idolatry language.


 * "Mohsin Nawaz is a notable personality of Pakistan" - User:MajidaKhanum
 * "Mohsin Nawaz is a known personality in Pakistan" - User:Haroon Christy


 * "He is a great motivational speaker." - User:Haroon Christy
 * "He is a great motivational speaker. - User:Fdeeba


 * "He is a role model" - User:Haroon Christy
 * "Mohsin Nawaz is a role model for us." - User:Fdeeba
 * "Wikipedia is a platform that signifies people who can become role model to many." - User:JohnOscar


 * "He is a source of inspiration for us" - User:MajidaKhanum Bolding mine
 * "Nawaz is a role model for us" - User:Fdeeba


 * Not sure if I can make it any clearer, I personally would be very surprised if they were not socks, but if you need anything more, ping me. I'm aware ST hasn't listed all the above accounts so they can be added to the investigation. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * So far all I can see here is three new accounts editing the same article (those are canned edit summaries), could you please supply diffs to show a similar editing style. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:34, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks SwisterTwister and Jcc. The following are ✅ to each other:
 * Following are to the above:
 * Blocked and tagged the above. There is a significant amount of promotional editing on the range, so I can't be 100% sure it's all related, they range from to ✅. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Following are to the above:
 * Blocked and tagged the above. There is a significant amount of promotional editing on the range, so I can't be 100% sure it's all related, they range from to ✅. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Following are to the above:
 * Blocked and tagged the above. There is a significant amount of promotional editing on the range, so I can't be 100% sure it's all related, they range from to ✅. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged the above. There is a significant amount of promotional editing on the range, so I can't be 100% sure it's all related, they range from to ✅. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged the above. There is a significant amount of promotional editing on the range, so I can't be 100% sure it's all related, they range from to ✅. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)