Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dudeofication/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Repeatedly created Arhaam rahaman, and Arhaam Rahaman, with exact same content; including the mistakes within it. Also, the similar username. — usernamekiran (talk)  13:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Pinging . — usernamekiran (talk)  13:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . Not sure what I'm supposed to say here, but seems fairly clear that it's the same user, given the similar usernames and the fact that they are recreating the same pages. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 13:09, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I thought any admin can declare two users as socks if there is enough behavioural evidence. And as you were online, and the salter of both the articles; I pinged you. I apologise again. I am still learning that SPI thing. Maybe Bbb33 will come around in a while. See you around :) — usernamekiran (talk)  13:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * no need to apologise, it looks like you're correct... I just wasn't familiar enough with the rules! Per Sockpuppet_investigations/SPI/Administrators_instructions it looks like behavioural evidence can be enough. I have to head off for a while now, but if nobody's acted on it by the time I'm back then I can deal with it. Thanks &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 13:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I have blocked both accounts indefinitely. Closing. Mz7 (talk) 08:51, 29 April 2018 (UTC)