Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dust429/Archive

Evidence submitted by Daedalus969
Obvious sock is obvious, per WP:DUCK. Please just bag and tag. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs 18:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
There is also at least.  — Soap  —  18:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * A rangeblock would be nice to prevent any more of these popping up. As a would a sleeper check. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:45, 11 September 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅ that the following are socks of :


 * . Someone can tag and move the case to the correct name if they like. Tiptoety  talk 18:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Marking for close. TN X Man  14:08, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

08 November 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Per this edit [|here] Wildthing61476 (talk) 20:28, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Already blocked. If more activity occurs, please feel free to refile. TN X Man 20:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)