Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dustry Joe/Archive

Evidence submitted by Greatblueyonder
After over a year of inactivity, Dustry_Joe created the Linton Robinson entry on 16 September 2009. One week later Linton_Robinson began editing the entry. Greatblueyonder (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

wikistalk results for Dustry_Joe and Linton_Robinson Greatblueyonder (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser request
Self-endorsing for CU on the filer. This is like the 3rd time this month in which a brand new account all of a sudden makes an SPI report. And just as with the other times, something doesn't look right here. MuZemike 02:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
There is no overlap between the two accounts, nor is there anything that I can see that consists of abusive sock puppetry. Dustry Joe has no previous block history, disruption, etc. This may be a case in which the Dustry Joe account was abandoned in favor of the User:Linton Robinson username (which may not have been the best thing to do since this screams WP:COI). MuZemike 02:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Dustry Joe and Linton Robinson are ❌. I can't find anything on . Brandon (talk) 23:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
No action taken per my observations above. If another administrator wants to look at it, go ahead, but I cannot find anything that shows abusive sock puppetry. MuZemike 01:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)