Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dy11111/Archive

05 April 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All blocked for block evasion - Cre 8 1 ve 23:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Umm, I think Cre81ve_master just shot him/herself in the foot here, I think it's Dy11111 again. See in particular chemical editing history and, for admins, Special:Undelete/SP:BlockList.  Also, reverting edits s/he made as an IP. ~  Amory ( u  •  t  •  c ) 00:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I don't know if this is helpful to connect the registered users, but here is a list of some (immediately) obvious IP socks of this user. ChemNerd (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - - Per the number of accounts and the obvoius sockpuppetry (some of them obvios from usernames alone), requesting CU on the blocked accounts and the account that opened this case. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ based on technical and behavioral evidence:

This guy is hopping IPs like crazy, so behavior is your best defense here. T. Canens (talk) 12:53, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * All socks are now blocked and tagged. Nothing more for us to do but keep blocking them as they come in Someguy1221 (talk) 00:54, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

12 June 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Edit content was "1YlGC6dsynvm VANDALIZED THIS PAGE", 1YlGC6dsynvm is a known sock of Dy11111. I am requesting a checkuser because -- if it is Dy11111 -- previous behavior suggests that sleeper accounts exist. Guy Macon (talk) 19:21, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Rschen7754 19:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note - locked/hidden by stewards, so I hope this can still be CUed... --Rschen7754 19:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ plus VVikiTr0113r2.2, Met4lH34dUpY0ur4$5 and Thewikiexploderlollololol and a few more already-blocked accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing, no tagging due to DENY Rschen7754 05:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

21 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

76.226.129.184 asked User:JamesBWatson for sandboxes of Template:BannedMeansBanned and Template:Locked global account (diff). While talk page stalking, I saw the request and created the pages, not thinking anything of it at the time. I now see the changes that 76.226.51.43 made to them match the behavior of Dy11111. (diff diff). Per WP:DENY, I think we should just leave the sandboxes alone instead of revert-warring on them, but blocks are still warranted. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Add to your list - an IP on the same range that, bizarrely, and with their first edit, opened a WP:AN thread requesting a CBAN on this user. See this.  Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 17:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Added. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I deleted both sandboxes. I don't see much point in blocking either IP as the range is dynamic, but someone may want to go through the pages he edited to see if anything needs repair. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * There isn't much we can do here, as the range is too busy to block, and single IP blocks are ineffective. Please consider reporting disruptive IPs to WP:AIV for block evasion so that they can be temporarily blocked. Named accounts, of course, should be reported here. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:12, 25 September 2013 (UTC)