Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/E-jay breezy/Archive

02 November 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Pair of linked users engaged in WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT on (eg) EJ Branch Fiddle   Faddle  14:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Admin comment. I just explained that the user needs to stick to one and only one account and invited him to do so. —C.Fred (talk) 14:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * This isn't a case for SPI because the accounts are not being used in an abusive manner (attempts to avoid scrutiny, vote stacking, etc.). The user should probably only use one account, but until abuse of multiple accounts is found, they are not in violation of WP:SOCK Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 22:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Closing this case with no action. Note that has taken the action of contacting the user to advise he use only one account.  Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 22:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

03 November 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

If there was insufficient evidence of abuse of accounts by the use of multiple ones, I believe we have it now :) Fiddle   Faddle  00:07, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * While still not a violation of WP:SOCK, I've gone ahead and blocked the editors under WP:DE. Closing case. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 00:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)