Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ENT 70/Archive

12 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

User:ENT 70 was blocked here and in the arabic wikipeida we found by Sockpuppet investigations in the arabic wikipedia that he has Sockpuppet account which is user:ربيع الغد. User:ربيع الغد or as his Former name user:anti cross is active here. The user:ENT 70 or user:ربيع الغد has cause many problems, vandalism and insults, besides racism and disruptive comments relating in particular to the Christian articles in Arabic Wikipedia. We also suffer since five days of harassment by this user in the Arabic Wikipedia. and we concern he will make the same kind of vandalism as he did in the arabic wikipeida espacially that the contributions of this user is controversial and subversive even here. and if there any more Sockpuppet of this user please add it. since he created more than 55 Sockpuppet in the arabic wikipedia.

I think can share also his opinion about this issue.--Jobas (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Checkuser evidence on arwiki (where I am a checkuser) showed that ar:User:ENT 70 created tens of sockpuppets that were used for personal attacks on other users and vandalizing the wiki. All those accounts are now blocked on arwiki. --Meno25 (talk) 06:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Email sent. Subject is "Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ENT 70". --Meno25 (talk) 05:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Checkuser comment: Aside from a few edits logged-out early on, we don't seem to have been swarmed by those socks on enwiki. No socks were found. Note that is stale on this project (last edit in early November, when he was blocked for disruptive editing and personal attacks), so there may be some other accounts happening. , you can email me with additional information if you think it might be helpful. Risker (talk) 00:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * is, according the SUL, the same user on arwiki and enwiki, so if an arwiki CU says they are a sock, I would be inclined to block as such regardless of the lack of local evidence; any objections, ? And/or a different solution based on the evidence sumbitted by e-mail? ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  20:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


 * , thanks for the email. I've re-examined based on the data, and have not located any other socks at this time. , I agree with your plan.  I note in passing that this user was originally named , but I expect the rename was done globally.  Risker (talk) 23:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Sock and master per above.  is a userpage redirect, but doesn't exist as an account (locally AND SUL), so it does appear the rename was integral. ☺ ·   Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  00:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

19 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

After User:ربيع الغد was blocked for being a sockpuppet, Sazed mahmud popped up. Sazed began editing the same article (Muhammad in the Bible) (see  which contained 60% of User:ربيع الغد's edits (see. It could be coincidence, but I believe it might be more than that.

Moreover, Sazed mahmud's edits are reverted and deleted for being "poorly written and formatted and referenced." Jeff5102 (talk) 21:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Checkuser note: While I see the similarities in style, these two accounts are ❌.  Risker (talk) 18:14, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * No action, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)