Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ERHaxhiu/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Same (similar) disruptive edits as indef blocked ERHaxhiu. For example at Kosovo national football team both has been adding table of stadium (diff Enzoo, diff ERHaxhiu). Honestly, not sure, but they seem similar. Qed237&#160;(talk) 09:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * If I may ask, how much do you need? They edit the same articles in same way, for example Loro Boriçi Stadium (diff and diff, both to show the same thing). Also at Kosovo national football team results both editors continously removes the format parameter (diff and diff). Both has been editing the same Kosovo and Albania related articles such as Albert Bunjaki, Albania national football team and so on. Qed237&#160;(talk) 16:01, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes, I know and I am sorry if I sounded aggressive. I just wanted to know because sometimes a diff for each editor is enough, sometimes more is needed. Not my intention to sound critical, it was just a simple question, but at the same time when I read it I understand it can be interpreted the wrong way. It is hard to get the "tone" in what you mean correct in text. Sorry if I offended you. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 18:11, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - That one diff appears suspicious, yes but that's not enough to warrant a checkuser. Can you provide more evidence before I endorse/or a CU is conducted? <span style="font-family:'Tahoma',Geneva,sans-serif"> QEDK  ( T  &#9749;  C ) 15:22, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * @Qed237, You have to understand that I cannot go through every inch of page history, it's better to have the evidence cut out, so that we can take action, even quickly. --<span style="font-family:'Tahoma',Geneva,sans-serif"> QEDK ( T  &#9749;  C ) 18:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * @Qed237, haha, I don't get offended, I just thought you were a bit too critical. I guess, that's sorted. Thanks for all the effort you put into this! :) --<span style="font-family:'Tahoma',Geneva,sans-serif"> QEDK ( T  &#9749;  C ) 18:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * -  <span style="font-family:'Tahoma',Geneva,sans-serif"> QEDK  ( T  &#9749;  C ) 18:04, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked. I'll leave the tagging to you, as I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to tag the master's userpage or not in this situation. ~ Rob 13 <sup style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">Talk 03:43, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Everything sorted. Thanks, BURob13. <span style="font-family:'Tahoma',Geneva,sans-serif"> QEDK  ( T  &#9749;  C ) 10:31, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Both editors edit the same articles in the same way and after watching the reported user a while I found a report necessary. For example if you compare the contributions, first you see that both editor almost always calls everything for "minor edit" (just like previous blocked sock User:EnZoo). As comparison, both the sockmaster and the reported editor has been making the same disruptive infobox change (diff ERHaxhiu, diff ALBUD) adding matches that dont belong (discussed at article talkpage). <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 11:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

You apologized for the mistake that I made, never it will not be repeated in mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by ALBUD (talk • contribs)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are ✅:
 * Blocked ALBUD and tagged all. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked ALBUD and tagged all. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked ALBUD and tagged all. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked ALBUD and tagged all. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Blocked ALBUD and tagged all. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)