Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eblem/Archive

12 August 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Boasts of maintaining sock accounts and admits to being Eblem (edit is RevDel'd, administrator privilege required to view contents.) CheckUser requested to look for sleeper accounts only. I understand the usual caveats about linking accounts to IP addresses. Eblem should not be editing anything anymore, as he has invoked the WP:RTV. Elizium23 (talk) 00:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

64.26.99.248 collaboratively edits Leewanda22's user page 64.26.99.248 says he is Eblem

AntiCoelacan is indef'd on a disruptive-username block

Edit by Coelacan: "Protected User talk:AntiCoelacan: Parent account user:Eblem now indef blocked. That's enough disruption out of this account. edit=sysop:move=sysop" Elizium23 (talk) 22:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I cannot provide diffs directly linking Leewanda22 and Eblem. Elizium23 (talk) 22:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Just because Eblem has said he wants to vanish doesn't mean he's followed the proper procedure to do so. At this point, he has not vanished. I need diffs of Eblem and Leewanda22 demonstrating that they are likely socks of each other. Otherwise, I will close the case. Also, Leewanda22 is an older account than Eblem, meaning that account is the master if there is a relationship between the two.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:22, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Not good enough. You've established that Eblem was indefinitely blocked in 2007. You've established that AntiCoelacan, according to an administrator, was Eblem's puppet at least 8 years ago. You still haven't provided any evidence that Leewanda22 and Eblem are related except through the IP, and that won't cut it. You need to provide diffs of the two named accounts (forget AntiCoelacan as that account is barely background). And if you are going to provide diffs, please also provide explanatory comments with those diffs (not just in the diffs themselves). It was a lot of work for me to piece together what you added (and most of it was not really relevant), and it's not my burden to do so. To be clear, I'm not evaluating whether Eblem is or was disruptive. I'm just determining whether this SPI is going to move forward.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Closing for lack of evidence. Bbb23 (talk) 22:43, 15 August 2015 (UTC)