Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ebolaboy/Archive

23 December 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Bear with me. This is all related to Jay Westerveld--this is one side of the edit war; the other is at Sockpuppet investigations/Enverbius. This is the more prolific side, I believe, with the distinct possibility of a ton of meat. If Ebolaboy is not the master, then Bog Turtle is. This is the side that continuously detracts from the subject's reputation and in passing advertises a resort that Westerveld apparently was involved with. Of particular interest is his appellation as biologist (also discussed on the talk page). Their edits vary from apparently legitimate ones to pure vandalism such as this (I'm blocking that one right now). Kimocarew is a bit odd, but given this edit I'm thinking they're a good hand/bad hand account, and they're already blocked. There may be more on the talk page but I want to save this first and take a break. Drmies (talk) 20:01, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I've added above. As far as I can tell without Checkuser, it is somewhat probably the same as . Meadow could have been a temporary account, or may have just been meat from the pro-Westerveld camp. FWIW, I'm convinced we'll find some connection between, , , and . Note User:Alan Stenberg and User:Bog Turtle have been blocked for WP:PA, and all continue to make anti-Westerveld personal attacks. If any connection is found, an indef is called for. I think it's likely that Westerveld and/or his supporters are socking/meating in response to the attacks. Cheers. JFHJr (㊟) 16:23, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I doubt Meadowlarkmelon belongs on this list, but I won't remove him myself. He's already listed at Sockpuppet investigations/Enverbius, which seems to be a more appropriate match to editors with the same editing behavior. Although, I am surprised that Semperfly isn't listed on that other SPI. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:32, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I've added User:Semperfly on the other SPI. On further reflection, I think you're probably right about User:Meadowlarkmelon.
 * As a note to the closing admin, in addition to socking/meatery, accounts conclusively linked to User:Bog Turtle share responsibility for this legal threat. Cheers. JFHJr (㊟) 19:16, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops--I sure meant to put Semperfly in there. I must have gotten so confused along the way that I forgot to add him. Thanks for setting me straight. Drmies (talk) 05:12, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Please see my results from another SPI case. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  16:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * As per the other case. ( X! ·  talk )  · @245  · 04:53, 26 December 2012 (UTC)