Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Edgarrr/Archive

Evidence submitted by Modelpanicer
even admits to it on jamesawatson page Modelpanicer (talk) 11:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

This nomination appears to have been made in bad faith by a sockpuppet of an editor one of whose other sockpuppets I had blocked, see Special:Contributions/Whommighter. The new sockpuppet has now been indef-blocked by another admin. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
No this is an alternate account not a sockpuppet, Admins usually never sockpuppet epecially not James--Lerdthenerd (talk) 11:11, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Legitimate alternative account — move to close this SPI. Favonian (talk) 11:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Nominator blocked indef as an obvious troll. Favonian (talk) 11:18, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * (not a suspected sock)

Evidence submitted by Basispoeter
Even admits it on his talk page. Similarity of names Basispoeter (talk) 02:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Filer is ✅ as ; the WP:BOOMERANG has returned on him. –MuZemike 03:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * All blocked -- DQ  (t)  (e)  03:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Vrenator
Vrenator (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Er, the sockpuppet has been blocked by 7. Not much else to do here. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Checkallower
check ip, ban dem str8 up yall Checkallower (talk) 12:13, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * - Sock self-ident'ed again, lets check for sleepers pls. -- DQ  (t)  (e)  12:26, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * In case it wasn't obvious, those identified were blocked under WP:DUCK -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 12:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * That looks like everyone. TN X Man  13:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Reaper Eternal
He recently came to my user talk page and made edits to it which makes me think that he is the same person as user:Moneysorter who is a sock puppet of user:Edgarrr. He complained about me reverting his edits, which I have not done. However, I did revert Moneysorter's edits. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

OK, and now User:Vividupperer is making the same style of edits to my user talk page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:33, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Sory? not me Lyingoftener (talk) 00:34, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * Both blocked indefinitely. Sock or not, their edit patterns were abusive. —C.Fred (talk) 00:39, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅ with no sleepers, and as well.  TN X Man  15:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC)