Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editor895/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Repeatedly messing about with Sabrina Ho, Draft:Sabrina Ho, and about six variations on her name. They've all been CU-confirmed, but I'm filing here for future note. Primefac (talk) 17:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All of the suspected socks are ✅ to one another. Angrylala is, but the behavioral evidence (deleted edits, mostly) is strong. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:33, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * . Primefac (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreation of Draft:Sabrina Ho which is the virtually identical to articles Sabrina Ho Chiu Yeng and Sabrina Ho - both of which were deleted and salted. Editorofthepage1 was identified as the authors of the previous articles. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:57, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

The report for the previous sock creating Sabrina Ho's article was filed here in error – I believe the correct sockmaster is Sockpuppet investigations/Editor895. Editorofthepage1 has been disruptive in an entirely different area. –FlyingAce✈hello 13:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , you are correct., I've moved the case to the proper location. it also helps if I actually sign. Primefac (talk) 20:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * - . Please check to identify potential sleepers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Playdellee is ✅ and . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Tagging and closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:48, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Ducking. The re-creation of deleted Sabrina Ho/Draft:Sabrina Ho to namespace Chiu Yeng Ho (moved to proper spelling Ho Chiu Yeng by me). Matthew_hk  t  c  13:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . I support a sleeper check, but in the meantime they're . Primefac (talk) 13:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, and . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Blast from the past which is why the evidence is even more damning. This brand new editor created a fully formed article that has several identical sections to past creations of Sabrina Ho Praxidicae (talk) 12:28, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Wow. 3 years later. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Indeffed for spam, closing. Primefac (talk) 00:24, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

It either a throw away account/sock, or meat sock (or unrelated upe?). The new suspect yet again recreate Sabrina Ho Chiu-yeng, under new article title. (See also Articles for deletion/Sabrina Ho Chiu-yeng) Matthew hk (talk) 16:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , Help me out here. You said, "under new article title".  What was the previous title? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Sabrina Ho (businesswoman), Ho Chiu Yeng, Chiu Yeng Ho, Sabrina Ho Chiu Yeng, Sabrina Ho, Draft:Sabrina Ho. Matthew hk (talk) 15:55, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - All previous socks are stale. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked for UPE. I don't see any particular reason to think they're E895, but clearly paid promotional editing based on their history. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)