Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editormart/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

James Waterford seems to have been created for the sole purpose of removing the COI and AfD templates from Martins Osodi and then voting at Articles for deletion/Martins Osodi. Given this behaviour, I feel that this warrants looking into as it's inappropriate AfD behaviour if found guilty of using a sock. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:37, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * It's very hard to gather enough evidence when the user has only made 2 edits but, in this edit, they cite WP:NLIST. I find it very difficult to believe that a brand new editor would immediately have the ability to cite a notability guideline like that. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I need more information. How do we know that and  are being controlled by the same person? Can you provide me with diffs or specific evidence that will help point this out? I see that they've edited the same article, but I need more than that.  ~Oshwah~  (talk)  (contribs)   19:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's likely they're the same person (and if not, then almost certainly a sock of somebody else and/or canvassed here from off-wiki). But, no temporal overlap, so technically not socking.  Closing with no action taken. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)