Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ednei Campos De Jesus De Brito/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same masha edits and username Praxidicae (talk) 12:45, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:43, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The editor has shown a narrow interest in articles edited by the suspected sockmaster, Draft:Masha's Tales and Masha and the Bear. Their talk page comments seem like a duck case when compared to Ednei Campos's mannerisms e.g. Special:Diff/943899644, Special:Diff/943984040, or pretty much anything else they've written on a talk page. signed,Rosguill talk 00:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Reasonable suspicion. Seems ducky to me. Blocked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The user is now using an IP address. Started using it at around the same time LalaloopsyLand-LalaOospies got blocked from editing. The user keeps editing the same article, with identical writing style in the edit summaries (e.g. ). The user even mentioned the sock master in their first edit. Obvious WP:DUCK.

The recently created account looks suspect, too, namely for making the same unconstructive edits in the same article (201.17.77.83, Mitologie Lovecraf), but since the sample size is too small, I did not include this username in the "official" part of this investigation.—J. M. (talk) 01:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC) J. M. (talk) 01:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - There's enough commonality both in the pages edited and the specific edits between Ednei and Mitologie to be worth a check, and also the other non-stale socks in the archive. I know you won't say anything about the IP, but this edit comment is kind of illuminating. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:14, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * . The Mitologie Lovecraft account is ✅ to Ednei Campos De Jesus De Brito, in addition to the following accounts:
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 06:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Due to extensive crosswiki abuse, I've reported these socks to meta:SRG for global locking. Mz7 (talk) 06:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 06:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Due to extensive crosswiki abuse, I've reported these socks to meta:SRG for global locking. Mz7 (talk) 06:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 06:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Due to extensive crosswiki abuse, I've reported these socks to meta:SRG for global locking. Mz7 (talk) 06:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * , closing. Mz7 (talk) 06:37, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Due to extensive crosswiki abuse, I've reported these socks to meta:SRG for global locking. Mz7 (talk) 06:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)