Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ehisyor2020/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Ehisyor2020 created the page Chaizor Daniel (which has already been deleted) and when they were warned for removing the speedy deletion tag from the page, Swift4040 was created and began doing the work. When Swift4040 was warned, Ehisyor2020 began editing again. Everytime one of them was warned, the other began doing the same edits to the page. It may be just a coincidence, but one ends in 2020 and the other in 4040. I know that part is weak evidence, but its still something to consider.  Z16 talk  16:07, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The timeline is very tight here, and given the behaviors between both of these accounts during this period of time, I'm willing to call this enough evidence to assert that the abuse of multiple accounts definitely is what happened here.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:38, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Both accounts have been inde'f (with a block notice left on the sock master's talk page). Closing SPI... Is tagging necessary in this situation?  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Pinging Bbb23 and Ivanvector with my question above.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   16:45, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The usual default at SPI for socking is tags. Is there a some reason why you think it inappropriate in this case?--Bbb23 (talk) 16:59, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Bbb23 - No, not at all. I know that the default is to tag, but in cases like this one that was just archived, the master wasn't tagged when the sock puppet accounts were. I thought maybe this case was related in that the users weren't instances where we have numerous sock puppets and keep finding more, and maybe we didn't tag those? Or maybe we just don't tag accounts we don't indefinitely block... I just wanted to ask and get clarity on this... Thanks for responding. Let me know if I'm correct or incorrect on any of these assumptions. In the meantime, I'll tag the master account here.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   17:03, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * We don't tag masters we don't indefinitely block.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:05, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Bbb23 - Okay, I knew that was the case. I guess I was just stupidly adding situations to what I knew... Thanks. :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   17:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC)