Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Einphally/Archive

17 February 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Persistent edits of the same page, the same fact (ref'd fact of Elcano being Spanish of Basque ethnicity), in many cases with edit summaries using the same style of bad English and mis-spellings and trying to mimick the name of another trusted editor. Virtually always single edit/page IPs or accounts. Akerbeltz (talk) 10:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to do anything based on behaviour? Akerbeltz (talk) 23:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's, but CU is really of no help here as the technical info varies too much. I'd go on behavior before the CU result. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  22:33, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Einphally and Hertzen blocked and tagged. I'm leaving Xabier untouched since behaviorally I can't be sure if he's in the same group. The article has been protected by another administrator. Someguy1221 (talk) 23:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * As I archive, noting that 194.183.97.0/25 would be the rangeblock if these IPs pop up again on a different article. NativeForeigner Talk 00:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC)