Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Elektrik Fanne/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

At Active shutter 3D system, two apparently separate users are making the same straw man argument, i.e. falsely claiming that adding a clarification saying how the system is sometimes implemented equates to an incorrect claim there is a disadvantage to the system.

[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Active_shutter_3D_system&diff=739033090&oldid=738719510] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AActive_shutter_3D_system&type=revision&diff=737413933&oldid=737402020]

The registered user appears to be creating the illusion of support by claiming the IP is a third party. 

Please note the IP belongs to Vodafone, so checkuser is unlikely to confirm. The user also recently opened WP:ANI, which I believe to be bogus. Burninthruthesky (talk) 16:23, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

At Talk:Ignition system, there are repeated straw man arguments in support of the article's claim that resonance is the "main function" of the capacitor.

[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AIgnition_system&type=revision&diff=714073818&oldid=713885347] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ignition_system&diff=prev&oldid=714386639] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AIgnition_system&type=revision&diff=712472250&oldid=712412348]

One of these IPs is also from Vodafone. The other was definitely in use by Elektrik Fanne when they made an accidental logged-out edit. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MiniScribe&diff=718295788&oldid=718294614] 10:37, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm closing this with no action. Everything is too old for it to matter.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

A Vodafone IP address returns again (see the archive) to Ignition system, repeating Elektrik Fanne's flawed arguments, including that "WP:AGF says that you have to accept" sources that cannot be verified [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ignition_system&diff=744654783&oldid=744634908] [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ignition_system&diff=746639296&oldid=746004132], and again repeating (see also the archive) the strawman that sources saying there is a resonant circuit support the disputed statements that this is a "function" of the capacitor. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ignition_system&diff=745964123&oldid=745834983][//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ignition_system&diff=746636841&oldid=745996570] Burninthruthesky (talk) 16:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I would have connected the accounts, but the IP is now inactive and the would-have-been 48-hour block expired. Closing without action, but future SPIs should consider this one as a factor in determining lengths of a block. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 13:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

A Vodafone user (now 148.252.129.151) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ignition_system&diff=prev&oldid=748502294 continues] the previous suspect's [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ignition_system&diff=prev&oldid=746640916 account] of obtaining the claimed Williamson source from the library.

They also repeat Elektrik Fanne's flawed argument, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ignition_system&diff=745964123&oldid=745834983 "If you want to be that pedantic then YOU need a cite that says resonance is irrelevant"] by saying, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ignition_system&diff=748502911&oldid=748502294 What cite have you provided that specifically states that resonance has no part to play in the operation of the circuit?]

Please note: Vodafone provide mobile internet access and their IPs are probably technically unrelated to the named account. Burninthruthesky (talk) 16:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I go away for a couple of weeks and come back to this mess.

This issue has been extensively discussed on the article talk page, so anyone could have picked it up.

The edits above have been carefully cherry picked. See also this edit from me and this edit from 148.252.128.92 (first part). Hardly from the same person as me. (It is clear from the talk page discussion that 148.252.128.92 is the same editor as 148.252.129.151.)

What Vodafone, and mobile access have to do with this is anyone's guess.

Please also see Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents -- Elektrik Fanne   14:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC)