Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ella Purnell/Archive

06 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility


 * User:EllaPurnell1996: Similar usernames editing the same page approximately five days apart, both with one diff each.
 * User:SummerRPurnell: The master sock's edit here references their Facebook page. This edit by User:SummerRPurnell specifically adds a link to the Facebook page, as well as here.
 * User:108.217.209.65 This edit adds the Facebook link too. Also, this adds back the fix the sock master made here after the whole "(aka "Molly Oliver"/"Summer R Purnell")" was removed. This is also another diff of the IP adding the previously mentioned phrase.
 * User:2602:306:cd9d:1410:3cd2:8172:713f:8418 and User:2602:306:cd9d:1410:c150:ef3a:25ed:a2f1: This shows User:EllaPurnell1996 adding the paragraph starting with "In 2014, ...". The IPs do the same respectively here and here.

Additional Comments: Regarding the other edits on Ella Purnell since 20 September 2015‎, User:Davey2010 and User:MusikAnimal are an experienced editor and an admin respectively. User:BG19bot and User:XLinkBot both appear to be legitimate bots, doesn't appear to be a problem either. User:WesternWoods appears to be a passing AGF editor, doesn't appear to be a sock. User:98.71.74.42 doesn't seem to be related both behaviorally and geolocation-wise. User:2602:306:cd9d:1410:3cd2:8172:713f:8418 and User:2602:306:cd9d:1410:c150:ef3a:25ed:a2f1 appear to from the same city/town and along with User:108.217.209.65, they all appear to be from Georgia, USA. JustBerry (talk) 22:57, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Sure, I understand what you're saying. However, there's no saying that a related article could be subject to editing by the same socks again. Just thought I'd put that out there. --JustBerry (talk) 23:29, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Ping never worked & only found this by SRP being blocked - The only reason I never reported this was that I'm basically crap with SPIs and I wasn't entirely sure if they were related or whatever so thanks for reporting 'em. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. If you would like, I would be glad to show you how I went about putting the case together, in case you might find that useful as a future reference (off-case, of course). --JustBerry (talk) 02:34, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * We could probably use to block one of the accounts but I don't think we need to bother with the IPs. All of the concerned users evidently only care about a single article that is now semi-protected, rendering the blocks ineffective &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  23:21, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The three accounts are ✅. All blocked and tagged. No action against IPs per . Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:07, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

09 November 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Editor's edited under and  on the Ella Purnell article, Since those accounts were blocked they've returned under a new account just to add more promo/unsourced content, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 23:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  02:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeffing and closing. protected the article for six months.