Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EmbracingCensorship/Archive

29 October 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

First of all, I've just come back from a long, extended Wikibreak so apologies if this request should never have even been filed, as it does seem a little tenuous but I think it's worth a quick look. User:EmbracingCensorship seems to be some kind of troll or extreme POV pusher, and was blocked indefinitely at 23:52, 28 October 2013 by User:Salvidrim! ; he was blocked for not being here to build an encyclopedia. A couple of hours later, an account called User:Not here to build an encyclopedia registers, and starts (I assume, most edits are rev-delled) vandalising, and is indeffed by User:Materialscientist. To me, it looks like EmbracingCensorship reacted angrily to his block, and created another account soon after to get 'revenge'. If an admin could see if there is any corroboration between the deleted revisions made by Not here to build an encyclopedia that'd be great if they could confirm a link. The reason I am requesting this is too see if a checkuser could see if there are any other similar accounts (Embracing wasted a lot of time arguing with people before the block, so seems like the kind of person who would devote time and effort to disruption), and if so block them or IP block. Thanks, Acather96 (click here to contact me) 09:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC) Acather96 (click here to contact me) 09:53, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The abusive edits made by Not here are nothing like those made by EmbracingCensorship, and they don't appear to be related at all. Open proxy blocked. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 11:49, 29 October 2013 (UTC)