Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Enciclopediaenlinea/Archive

31 August 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Enciclopediaenlinea seems to have a habit of causing logged out disruption. See Equatorial Guinea for example. In the article Spanish language, Enciclopediaenlinea was warned for edit warring, restoring these edits:, , ,. The most recent IPs have continued to edit war with 83.58.113.183 and 81.32.191.163. Elockid  ( Talk ) 18:29, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Actually, it looks like he has abandoned the account and gone back to editing as an IP. While a bit disruptive, it is not forbidden. If the IPs edit war, block them for edit warring. If he evades a block with the account, then we will have something to deal with. Until then, closing, with no action taken. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:07, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

12 October 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Enciclopediaenlinea has been edit warring over the infobox on African Union for months now. After recently being blocked for this edit war, Editaton was created an resumed the edit war. TDL (talk) 02:53, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

The user started yet another account. Knisfo (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Pretty obvious to me. Socks blocked and tagged, sockmaster blocked for a week. Closing &mdash;  MusikAnimal talk 02:35, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

13 January 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Editor Enciclopediaenlinea has had a recent history of adding spanish names to the infoboxes of articles (1, 2, 3, 4), he was temporary banned. Afterwards the editor John1796 began to make a similar edit (1). Please take a look at this. I hope I am wrong, but just in case, it might be worth looking into. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The CU was as  appears to have been using proxies/webhosts. It seems evident however that they are the same user so I blocked the account. I'll leave it to the closing Clerk to decide what to do about the master.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  23:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm not a clerk, but we are dealing with an editor with a history over several years of sockpuppetry and edit-warring, and who still continues to do so, despite having been subject to five time limited blocks. I have blocked the master account indefinitely. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)