Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EnlightenmentNow1792/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
MichelParkinboom is a sock created for targeting same subjects as EnlightenmentNow1792. EnlightenmentNow1792 can't edit because he was indeffed by.

Supporting "Alternative Draft #2" which was composed by EnlightenmentNow1792 on Talk:Azov Battalion. This is beyond WP:DUCK.

Try to get rid of same information on Russian Orthodox Army while letting the "not ideal source" or "not reliable" source stay there.

Edit warring on Aleksandr Dugin, though over different content.

"unencyclopedic"

Use of the phrase "at any rate".


 * MichelParkinboom is also abusing 35.7.4.87 because this and this are identical concerning the same dispute.
 * Same writing style as Enlightenment1792 in edit summary.

Same style of tearing journalist credibility: "random fringe journalist", "this fringe figure as a notable journalist". >>> Extorc. >>> Extorc . talk  09:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  Girth Summit  (blether)  15:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅, along with:
 * Blocking etc. Girth Summit  (blether)  15:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm taking no action against the IP - it's from a range that did not crop up in any of the checks I ran, and with only a single edit there isn't enough behavioural evidence to makea determination.  Girth Summit  (blether)  15:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Tagged. Bbb23 (talk) 15:58, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * too, for the record. --Blablubbs (talk) 23:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * too, for the record. --Blablubbs (talk) 23:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
MichelParkinboom is a sock created for targeting same subjects as EnlightenmentNow1792. EnlightenmentNow1792 can't edit because he was indeffed by.

Supporting "Draft #2" which was composed by EnlightenmentNow1792 on Talk:Azov Battalion. Per WP:DUCK. Infinity Knight (talk) 15:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I think Redandteal is someone's sock (based on the tactics displayed in their early contributions), but not this person's--but I say this based on geolocation, which indicates a very, very different location, but isn't always reliable of course. I'd like to hear what says. Drmies (talk) 15:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Behaviorally, I don't think they are the same person, unless EN1792 is intentionally changing his writing style to avoid detection.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not jumping out as being familiar to me. Agree that it's very unlikely to be EN1792., if there's a particular case you want to jog my memory on, feel free to drop me an e-mail. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  16:20, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * No,, just for confirmation--since you dropped the block on EnlightenmentNow1792. Thanks, and thank you Bbb, Drmies (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The small amount of evidence is unpersuasive. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 16:22, 17 May 2022 (UTC)