Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Enoch22/Archive

29 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Enoch22 has been, since 2006, trying to keep an article about a low-profile Seattle musician, Betty X, up on Wikipedia. Most of this went down at Salon Betty, but recently editors have tried to pick up at Betty X and after an AfD didn't see their way at Betty X (Artist). Given the apparent obscurity of the subject, I find it highly suspect that Monsavenus, an SPA, is commenting at Talk:Betty X (Artist). I will also point out that neither Enoch22 nor Monsavenus could format their contested deletion properly--both commented on the line below, not within the "your reason here" field. That's the basis for my CU request. There are also a few IPs at Talk:Betty X (Artist) who have chimed in similarly, and I get the sense that it's just a guy on a mission, or some friends on a mission. I also note that there was a Mons venus who edited Salon Betty in 2008. I'm excluding that from the CU req for obvious reasons. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 10:12, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sock indeffed, master blocked for a month. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)