Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ericbiddle/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets




Evidence submitted by Singularity42
(Okay, so this is an old case - some of the editors have not edited since 2007. But at least one of these accounts has edited recently.)

This is a case of either sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. The only edits these accounts do is add claims to articles that "Eric R. Biddle" is innocent of whatever crimes he has been convicted of. All contributions of all accounts are the same thing.

They use the same language, the same formatting (including such things as signing their additions to articles), and usually post identical copies of the same paragraphs. Most of these accounts are dated, so Checkuser probably won't help too much, but I'm requesting it in case I missed accounts that are currently active (given the number of possible socks already). Singularity42 (talk) 13:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by Singularity42 (talk) 13:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

. Nothing to check against; checkuser data expires after three months. Therefore there is only one checkable account, which won't prove any relation to the others. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 23:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. Wasn't sure when the cut-off was. Singularity42 (talk) 23:58, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
Looks like they are obviously the same person, so I've blocked them all. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 23:59, 25 October 2009 (UTC)