Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Erictheprince/Archive

05 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

CU evidence -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 11:04, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Adding new IP. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B095:6CD9:12FD:9C11 (talk) 14:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Same as Lifeguard5770 in that their only edits support keeping the Eric the Prince article. sixty nine  • speak up •  14:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC) Offered to make a donation to Wikipedia in exchange for keeping his autobiography up. 2601:188:0:ABE6:B095:6CD9:12FD:9C11 (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Editing only on, you guessed it, Eric the Prince, as well as the article for Mac Lucci that is tagged for CSD for lack of notability. This is just nuts. sixty nine  • speak up •  22:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Comment Those other accounts were family members in my house who I told about the fact that the last 12 hours of work I put into the creation of the account was being flagged even though all of the criteria was met.

Again I reiterate these are not promotional accounts, how about you help add and contribute instead of deteriorate and belittle the life work of legendary producers and artists!?! As I mentioned I run Rap.com and that is credible enough. I have created both a non bias rapper account and a non bias producer account and my own personal account to establish the framework for which to conduct the rest of the interviews with the artists that are not currently on Wikipedia that meet the standards of notable musician. I am appalled at the apparent lack of support for the creation of more hip hop industry profiles. I ask that you edit the pages towards completion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RapAuthority (talk • contribs) 16:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You're repeating this same spiel over and over again, but the fact is you are using seven accounts and are even resorting to bribery (excuse me, donation) in order to keep a host of non-notable articles about subjects with no third-party citations that you yourself have interviewed. That is called promotion, my friend. sixty nine   • speak up •  16:56, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ All three accounts. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 11:05, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, is  at best. Check was requested at AIV. --  Amanda  (aka DQ) 11:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I have invited RapAuthority to clarify what he or she means by "I have created both a non bias rapper account and a non bias producer account and my own personal account." If he or she answers, the answer may influence what decision should be made about the other accounts listed here. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Indeffing the master and his socks. Blocking meatpuppets for a week. Closing.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

09 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Comment at Eric the Prince AfD, signed as RapAuthority; as well as a comment on a user talk page also signed as RapAuthority sandgemADDICT yeah? 13:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Blocked one week based on behavior. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2016 (UTC)