Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Erios30/Archive

22 March 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''


 * 1) Contributions of both accounts are in the same articles (IP= and Erios30=).
 * 2) Same wording in edition explanation (Erios30: and IP: ): "What the source says".
 * 3) Same irrational claims over a map in Wikimedia Commons (Erios30: and IP:): Mention of alleged lack of sources and inability to read map.
 * 4) IP has claimed time and again to be willing to make its own account. Yet, to this point the IP has failed to do as it stated it would.-- MarshalN20 | T a l k 03:35, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Essentially, IP user with extensive knowledge of WP. Started editing since March 21. User Erios30 is an established WP user in Spanish articles. He started editing in English WP since March 16. This case has several of the signs in the Signs of sock puppetry essay. Best regards.-- MarshalN20 | T a l k 00:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)  MarshalN20  | T a l k 00:15, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
Comment: Even though it is advisable to conduct a test to clean all doubts, all I did was to intervene precisely because I saw a tendentious editing in both parties, the edits of today alone showed that MarshalN20, for each edit of Erios30 revenges making the article more and more biased. All I did was to try to restore the article to its more neutral form, but MarshalN20 was too quick to launch accusations, all comments of this user to my person and acts were extremely offensive without justification, it has been told to refrain from doing so, yet he keeps on doing do that. I'd appreciate if after the check confirming that I'm not the same person, someone could please extend a warning regarding this kind of behavior, reading the past talks in the article I can see that is not the first time this user attacks other users for trying to edit the article, there was a formal mediation before; for what I've read so far about it I believe that the agreement reached there was the best option and it should be preserved to avoid another edit war, however I don't think there are any signs of an improvement of the situation so I'll try to help making an account tomorrow. 200.87.23.193 (talk) 01:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Your actions speak for themselves. You may try to act innocent now, accusing me of personal attacks that do not exist, but your edit record shows that:
 * 1. Despite being a recent editor, you are well-aware of WP rules (and their tricks).
 * 2. Your edits are conveniently mixed in with the same account of User:Erios30 in order to avoid breaking the 3RR.
 * 3. Your edit summaries are similar in style with those of User:Erios30.
 * How exactly can I assume good faith from an editor that keeps deleting sourced material and pictures, acuses me of POV edits, and then claims I am making personal attacks (despite the admins explicitly responded: "I don't see any violations of civility"?Everything points out to you being a sockpuppet; and I don't mean that as an insult rather as a valid conclusion based on premises.-- MarshalN20 | T a l k 05:37, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I'm sorry, but checkuser will not publicly disclose links between named accounts and IPs. TN X Man 02:19, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't know that. Thank you for the information.-- MarshalN20 | T a l k 02:54, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Since this case opened, the IP hasn't been used. I'm closing for now, but relist if it becomes active again. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)