Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EscEscEsc/Archive

16 January 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.


 * Previous sockpuppet accusation for EscEscEsc here
 * Full edit history here and for 87.66.170.243 the history is here
 * Re WP:EWS, this user has popped up out of the blue to tip the balance in edit wars and heavy debates on two occasions. Every single edit made by both editors has been highly contentious:
 * Today, here from EscEscEsc on Palestine, supporting 87.66.170.243, No More Mr Nice Guy and Shrike (see talk) as well as two edits discussing The Making of Modern Israel here from 87.66.170.243 and here from 87.66.170.243 supporting No More Mr Nice Guy, Jiujitsuguy, Shrike and others
 * On 3/4 May, EscEscEsc made a number of contentious edits on PLO article, against users SeanHoyland/Ohiostandard, Vittorio Arrigoni against user Nableezy, Dahiya doctrine article against users Ohiostandard / SeanHoyland / Poyani / Nableezy, Hamas school bus attack here against user Ohiostandard / SeanHoyland. These edits were all against the same group of editors, but the third and four ones were in support of the same editor - "Jalapenos do exist" and the second is an article which NoMoreMrNiceGuy and many IPs have been heavily involved in
 * I am not prepared to accuse any editor of being the mastersock here, as there have been many other editors involved and the connection to a single other user from public information is thin
 * Edit histories solely devoted to two occasions of jumping in to Israel/Palestine-related edit wars involving a small subset of editors is very strong circumstantial evidence of sockpuppetry. Since the users appear to have been careful to keep tracks covered, I suggest CheckUser is used, perhaps comparing against a handful of the editors involved in the above edit wars Oncenawhile (talk) 00:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' I've added a further IP, since this edit makes it clear that it is the same editor as the first IP. RolandR (talk) 09:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

This two IPs are probably the same person editing under dynamic IP but what is the violation here?And what is the behavioral connection to user:EscEscEsc?--Shrike (talk) 12:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - CU won't connect an IP to an account. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Since this case was opened the IPs have gone quiet. I'm closing with no action taken for now, but relist if necessary. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:25, 21 January 2012 (UTC)