Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Espia/Archive

Evidence submitted by Nightscream
These five accounts persistently added the same unsourced material to the Alexandra Daddario article, despite my making it clear in my edit summary, and on their talk pages when removing it that it violates WP:NOR, WP:V, etc.

Here are the edits in question:
 * Edit by Espia
 * Edit by Iainse
 * Edit by Mmsnapplez
 * Edit by Mario Žamić
 * Edit by Bwilkins

The fact that the Iainse and Mmsnapplez accounts were recently created (particulary Mmspannlez), may also be possible evidence of sockpuppetry. Nightscream (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

2.17.10 Update: Added Mario Žamić to the list. 2.18.10 Update: Added Bwilkins

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
I don't think User:Bwilkins is a sockpuppet. I have asked using the template to insert that info. I didn't know there was already an DOB issue with the article. And just for the record, I'm NOT a sock. --Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 21:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Requested by Nightscream (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Nathan  T 21:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm not really sure on this one. All of the accounts except for one have been around for several years, and even that one has edits in last October. It makes no sense to me that someone would sleep these accounts for up to four years and more just to add a birthdate and birthplace to one page. J.delanoy gabs adds  02:23, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

This looks more like various editors found the same sources and were engaged in a content dispute, not sockpuppetry. -- Avi (talk) 05:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

marking as closed, no further action by SPI SpitfireTally-ho! 08:24, 24 February 2010 (UTC)