Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EstablishmentOfKnowledge/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( originally filed under this user)

Resumed editing barely an hour after PakistanHistorian's sock Historianist01 was indeffed. Before that, they hadn't edited since 5 April.

Like PakistanHistorian's socks, this user also makes the same POV edits in the related articles of Pahari-Pothwari ‎and Lahnda. For example, like PakistanHistorian attempted to portray this language as "Punjabic"  so does WikiShedia for Pahari-Pothwari  HistoryofIran (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - At first glance, they're ❌ to this case, but ✅ to . Still digging. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * - I'm going to call and  ✅.  I see enough differences in their behavior that I can't be sure and there are some factors in the technical data which make it difficult to make a clear call.  I'd like for somebody who is more familiar with the subject area to take a closer look at the behavior; if you are convinced they're a behavioral match, feel free to tag as confirmed.  In any case, the technical data clearly says they're not PakistanHistorian, so they should be broken out to their own case. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Case split from Sockpuppet investigations/PakistanHistorian, setting status back to checked. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 19:43, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Since this case has sat open for three straight months without any additional claims of abusive sockpuppetry, I'm going to just go ahead and close it with no action taken. If further evidence suggesting abusive sock puppetry is occurring, please feel free to re-file. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)