Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EthicalAugur/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
Both EA and V29 edit hyper-specific issues related to the Middle East/North Africa and seem to have a POV bias against Arabs and Arab groups (specifically see the deleted drafts of V29). Most damingly, EA just came by to sign a comment made by V29: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AMiscellany_for_deletion%2FDraft%3APolisario%27s_connection_to_terrorist_organizations&diff=1213843821&oldid=1213655569. who recently blocked V29 and who were all involved at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents, which was brought up by V29 and ended in his blocking. ―Justin ( koa v f ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC) ―Justin ( koa v f ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * this edit is simply unacceptable, regardless of whether they are a sock or not, as it speaks volumes about the kind of editor that they are. In any case, and assuming that they'll survive this, they'll do well to stay far away from contentious topics. M.Bitton (talk) 21:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * thank you very much for looking into so quickly. I guess that Sockpuppet_investigations/Mosti95 is no longer relevant. Best, M.Bitton (talk) 22:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * That diff is misleading, since there's one intermediate edit which would explain what happened there. Careless, yes, but it's not a strong case. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * EthicalAugur is ❌. Vogelman29 is confimed to be . Closing. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC)